NodeMaven vs NetNut 2026 — Side-by-Side Comparison
Last updated: May 2026 — Independent benchmark by ToptierProxy Editorial Team
Choosing between NodeMaven and NetNut? This side-by-side comparison covers pricing, pool size, proxy types, country coverage, anti-bot success rates and best use cases to help you decide.
NodeMaven Overview
NodeMaven positions itself as a quality-first proxy provider: rather than competing on raw pool size, it runs every IP through a real-time quality filter before assigning it, backed by a reported 99%+ success rate and a 24-hour sticky session ceiling.
- Pool Size: 30M+ IPs
- Countries: 190+
- Price: from $3.75/GB
- Best For: Account management & automation teams who want pre-filtered IP quality
- Rating: 4.87/5
- Trust Score: 90/100
NetNut Overview
NetNut's domains were seized by the FBI in July 2026 following a Google-led investigation tying its residential IP pool to a botnet of hijacked devices. We do not recommend using NetNut at this time.
- Pool Size: Unavailable
- Price: from $4.5/GB
- Best For: Not recommended - see status update
- Rating: 1/5
- Trust Score: 0/100
Which Is Better: NodeMaven or NetNut?
Both NodeMaven and NetNut are strong proxy providers but serve different needs. NodeMaven is best for account management & automation teams who want pre-filtered ip quality while NetNut excels at not recommended - see status update. For most users, the choice comes down to budget, pool size requirements and the specific targets you need to scrape.